1/17/2024 0 Comments Red tube animal![]() "And like members of the Borg, which are mentally connected, pyrosome members are physically connected– actually sharing tissues," adds marine bioligst Dr Rebecca Helm.Ī pyrosome's shape is held by a gelatinous "mucus baloon", which suspends each zooid within its walls. The individual mouthparts are aimed away from the balloon's hollow interior, continuously taking in water as they move fluidly through the ocean. They manoeuvre around using a suck-and-blow strategy akin to jet propulsion, working together as one singular organism to pull and push water through tiny slits in their bodies. The zooids that make up one long pyrosome are clones of one another, with each individual capable of adding to the colony by copying itself. It was entirely made up of tiny, clear elongated bubbles. There were no eyes or anything like a face. ![]() "It was open at one end with nothing inside and yet it seemed to move as if the tapered end was some kind of head. "As we watched, it became more mesmerising!" says Perez. "It was drifting and hovering in an odd way at about 80ft of depth," recalls diver Ivan Perez. "We remove any plastic we find so that turtles will not mistake it for jellyfish and try to eat it."Īs the team approached the drifting structure, its true nature was revealed: the tube was not man-made, but rather a colony of tiny organisms called zooids. In fact, they initially mistook the Borg-like creature for trash. With over 20,000 dives logged between them, not a single member of the team had ever seen a pyrosome. The crew of Expedition Akumal came across the colony while working to remove invasive lionfish from the local reefs. It is very much alive, and made up of thousands and thousands of tiny clones. In addition to being unnecessarily cruel, animal tests are also less effective compared to newer forms of assessment like computer modeling or tests using human cells, said the Humane Society International.This strange, red windsock was spotted off the coast of Akumal, Mexico. The bill was first read in the House of Commons in April and received royal assent on June 22.Ĭosmetic testing has historically included “toxicity tests” in which animals are focused to consume or inhale certain chemicals, or have the chemicals applied to their skin or eyes, according to the Humane Society International’s Animal-Free Safety Assessment Collaboration. The text of the bill stipulates “No person shall sell a cosmetic unless the person can establish the safety of the cosmetic without relying on data derived from a test conducted on an animal that could cause pain, suffering or injury, whether physical or mental, to the animal” and that “No person shall conduct a test on an animal that could cause pain, suffering or injury, whether physical or mental, to the animal.” ![]() The amendment banning cosmetic testing on animals in one of a package of amendments included in the measure. The release added Health Canada is also working to identify “effective alternatives to animal testing” outside the cosmetic world. We will keep working with experts and international partners to explore safe, cruelty-free alternatives so no more animals suffer and die due to cosmetic testing.” “We are proud to move forward with this measure, and to assure Canadians that the products they buy are cruelty-free. “Protecting animals, now and in the future, is something that many Canadians have been calling for, and something we can all celebrate,” said Canadian Minister of Health Jean-Yves Duclos in the release. ![]() Additionally, 10 states in the US have banned the practice: New York, Virginia, California, Louisiana, New Jersey, Maine, Hawaii, Nevada, Illinois, and Maryland. ![]() ANIMAL TESTING IN COMSETICS INDUSTRY - stock photo Siqui Sanchez/The Image Bank RF/Getty Imagesġ0 states have now banned the sale of cosmetics tested on animalsĬanada will join the ranks of the European Union, Australia, the United Kingdom, and South Korea, which have all moved to ban cosmetic testing on animals, according to the release.Ī total of 44 countries have passed laws banning cosmetic animal testing, according to the Humane Society International. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |